day of dead art women

images Day Of The Dead Art - El Dia day of dead art women. On May 17, 1996 a woman#39;s
  • On May 17, 1996 a woman#39;s



  • nlssubbu
    09-24 01:52 PM
    Can you please provide the link ?
    I refered to USCIS website but did not find a mention of copies of DL.
    PLease advise.
    Thanks

    I do not think that copies of DL is necessary. Please double check with your attoney before sending them.





    wallpaper On May 17, 1996 a woman#39;s day of dead art women. day of dead art women
  • day of dead art women



  • webm
    07-11 01:38 PM
    again no one can explain the ridiculous date movements by DOS...so there can be no reason for this..Its just that someone saw numbers being wasted...and they randomly applied them to EB2...Now as for getting approvals for all those that are current now...forget it ...since that is USCIS and that is a whole different Animal (a lazy one!!)

    It's true..even PD,processing times current scenario also..AOS approval rate was very slow...as it happenend for me 2 months May,June being current EB3-I nothing happened..:(

    Crazy CIS and its policies..:mad:





    day of dead art women. day of the dead art women.
  • day of the dead art women.



  • harshalx
    04-14 01:00 AM
    To get rid of these problems which we face with untrustworthy consultants I've started http://www.goolti.com

    <a href="http://www.goolti.com">http://www.goolti.com</a>

    where you can read/write reviews about Desi consulting companies.





    2011 day of dead art women day of dead art women. Woman shot, killed outside
  • Woman shot, killed outside



  • gk_2000
    08-10 08:41 PM
    So according to this interpretation EB1 also will be retrogressed till everybody from previous years gets gc !

    Good point. But there should be no holy cows where justice is concerned



    more...


    day of dead art women. Art, Still Not Dead!
  • Art, Still Not Dead!



  • Refugee_New
    07-28 01:09 PM
    Good point!

    As per our religion Parents are always Gods. And there is story of Lord Ganesha about when he was asked that who is your God? He said my parents.

    This is where the problem starts chantu. For us in India, anything and everything is god. Indian movie actress's are our gods. We build temple to them. Amitabh is a god, Manisha is a god. These people take the gods avtars in our movies. But we all know how those people are. Most of them in that industry commit adultry.

    Our Hindu party BJP uses these movie celebraties during election. We easily portray gods using those filthy people. So this is where problem starts. We have to clean our own backyard first.





    day of dead art women. day of dead art women.
  • day of dead art women.



  • grupak
    02-15 05:33 PM
    Look, I don't want to enter a pissing match with anyone here. Go read your history (http://americanhistory.suite101.com/article.cfm/limiting_the_huddled_masses) before jumping to conclusions.

    Supporting a law based on eugenics is very sad indeed.



    more...


    day of dead art women. day of dead art women.
  • day of dead art women.



  • ksadara1
    06-11 01:56 PM
    Hi Guyz,

    I just joined the group today and looks like the group is quite active in making the issues reach the concerned people. Let me know if I can do anything from my side to keep the ball rolling.

    Kumar

    email: sadaramkr@gmail.com
    Residence: Newport/Pavonia.
    EB2 and just filed for my I-140.





    2010 day of the dead art women. day of dead art women. Day Of The Dead Art - El Dia
  • Day Of The Dead Art - El Dia



  • JazzByTheBay
    03-10 01:15 PM
    Most of our members lose focus after the first week of anguish immediately following a visa bulletin.

    After that, we willingly engage in:
    1. LUD-watching (as a sport)
    2. Social networking on IV (reading forum threads, responding, stating how anguished we feel, talking about our contributions to the U.S. and how unfair the system is... )
    3. Punching the clock, waiting for the next visa bulletin thread
    4. Posting and speculating on the next visa bulletin thread, while waiting for the actual bulletin to show up
    5. Continue to blame USCIS, DoS, the Congress, the President, and the American people for not realizing our importance.
    6. Back to #1 (rinse, repeat... ), and hope for different results.

    What we will not do (skip this if you are participating actively):
    1. Participate in IV activities/action items
    2. Willingly contribute time and/or money towards achieving our goals

    As President Obama says (Boston Globe | Obama: Time of crisis can be 'great opportunity' (http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/03/08/obama_time_of_crisis_can_be_great_opportunity/?rss_id=Boston.com+--+Latest+news)), an economic crisis presents the biggest opportunity for drastic change.
    "We've experienced great trials before," Obama said. "And with every test, each generation has found the capacity to not only endure, but to prosper -- to discover great opportunity in the midst of great crisis. That is what we can and must do today. And I am absolutely confident that is what we will do."If the President sees this time of crisis as a great opportunity, I see no reason why we should see the crisis as the greatest handicap for not working towards change.

    Let's realize that we will never reach our goals in this lifetime without working for that change.

    jazz

    the problem is that we come up with such ideas only when visa bulletins come ..after few days everyone forgets.
    there is not much direction from core either and that makes you wonder if there will be any campaigns at all in the future for recapture

    the problem is that we come up with such ideas only when visa bulletins come ..after few days everyone forgets.
    there is not much direction from core either and that makes you wonder if there will be any campaigns at all in the future for recapture



    more...


    day of dead art women. Josephine March, Little Women.
  • Josephine March, Little Women.



  • immi2006
    09-26 10:22 AM
    Do you think Lawyers used the rally to further their business and had IV as a front to project that as a H1 CAP increase ?

    1) Lawyers would not do anything for free
    2) At the very best - we need to have another rally in Silicon Valley to highlight
    our cause with immeiate Effect, otherwise, folks can twist it as H1 rally.

    We will have to explicity state Rally for

    Green Cards for tax paying professionals !

    What do you all think ? - Do u think we can mobilise folks for this saturday ?

    We need to keep the momentum high in public than in Blogs and IV site,.





    hair Woman shot, killed outside day of dead art women. quot;La Muertaquot; (The Dead Woman)
  • quot;La Muertaquot; (The Dead Woman)



  • vgayalu
    10-05 01:34 PM
    Hi Guys,

    My attorney sent the response last week and it was delivered to the Dallas, TX. I am little concerned that my attorney actually sent the response to a courier address rather than the PO Box for TSC that they ask you to send. So far I have not seen any updates on my case.

    Vgayalu: After how many days did you see an update after you sent the response to the RFE.


    RFE received date : 09/07/10
    RFE Response sent (MAIlED) : 09/29/10
    (IN USPS to PO BOX by Express mail)

    RFE Response Received by USICS : 09/30/10 ( On line update on same day). - Hard LUD

    Again there is one more soft LUD on 10/01/10.

    Approval update : Hard LUD 10/05/10.



    more...


    day of dead art women. day of dead art women. quot
  • day of dead art women. quot



  • thomachan72
    04-11 09:32 AM
    Before taking up any agenda, check with IV core whether it is the right time.

    If it was the right time, why wouldn't IV core initiate any action items when members are so willing to take up those ?

    I think Suhail raised a verry valid point. However, to recapture unused visa numbers might not just be an administrative fix. it would require a law being passed just for that and that then becomes a whole different issue.
    We know visa numbers have been wasted but can we persuade and get a majority vote on a legislation that would recapture unused visa numbers?? That to me is a mighty big task in itself.... just like raising the country limits.
    I am certainly not discouraing anybody....
    On the other hand, is there any legal issue involved that could be fought in a court of law?? Since there were more applications pending than the allowed anual limit why were not sufficient numbers of visas issued? was it because there was a per country limit?? If that is true they can simply say unless the per country limit is removed they cannot issue more numbers to India/china.
    Personally, I therefore feel more inclined to fight for these:-
    1) Taking of the per country limits (toughest one)
    2) Allowing change of status application irrespective of availability of visa numbers
    3) Allowing for H1b stamping from within the US
    4) premium processing of I-140





    hot Art, Still Not Dead! day of dead art women. This reminds me of an art show
  • This reminds me of an art show



  • frostrated
    08-21 11:20 AM
    I am NOT here illegally. I was told BY someone at USCIS when I submitted the first application that as long as I was submitting requested applications and the required fees, I was not considered an illegal alien. If that was the case, why has no one at USCIS ever told me that? They know where I live, who I live with and everything else they need to know, I have no secrets from them, but not once have I received a letter, phone call or anything else to request for me to leave. I guess those of you that are professionals or those who already have a green card, are better than people like myself who are considered blue collar. I don't receive a dime for what I do, room and board is it so therefore I am not taking away anything from Americans who were born in this country.
    In 2003 when I arrived here, PASSPORTS WERE NOT REQUIRED. I had a birth certificate and valid driver's license, that is all customs asked for at the Toronto airport and that is all I gave them. IF passports were required, I would have gotten one, but since they were not, what was I to do? I am not from an overseas country and I have visited the US most of my life as a child and as an adult without any trouble and was never asked for a passport. All that changed in 2005 - not my fault.
    I came here looking for some assistance but seem to have gotten a bunch of sarcastic comments that are really not helpful and weren't necessary.
    It's funny how you make assumptions and you all are here for similar reasons and needed help at some point. As for not criticizing USCIS for doing their job right - I doubt you would say the same thing if you were my shoes. I do not appreciate the criticism or sarcasm, I thought this was supposed to be a place to get some help, I guess I was wrong.
    I won't be back.
    It is true that when you entered the country, passports were not required of Canadian citizens. But you overlook one aspect. Canadian citizens who are visitors to the United States need to leave at the end of 6 months. Any visitor who stays beyond six months is accuring illegal stay. If you came in 2005, either in late 2005 or early 2006 you started to accure illegal stay. This is not a fault of the USCIS, but yours in not finding out about the rule. Also, A visitor who intends to live, work or study in the U.S. may be permanently barred from the U.S. Please refer to Canadian Citizens • U.S. Consular Services in Canada (http://www.consular.canada.usembassy.gov/canadians.asp) for more details on your stay.
    As for blaming the USCIS for not notifying you earlier, there are a plethora of applications pending before yours, so it will take time for them to look at your application. The additional forms that USCIS has asked you, were forms that you need to have sent when you applied your I-485. These were all suplments you would have found had you looked up the filing instructions. no I-485 can be approved without those forms. It has been law since the early 1990s when the law was made.
    And, since you entered the country to marry your fiance, when that did not happen, you should have left and re-applied through another means. If the people you are looking after cannot afford to pay for your adjustment, and pay you only food and board, they are in fact breaking the law by hiring an illegal alien. Room and food is considered pay as far as USCIS is concerned.



    more...


    house girlfriend day of dead art day of dead art women. Day of the Dead middot; Inspired
  • Day of the Dead middot; Inspired



  • fromnaija
    07-23 05:19 PM
    My lawyer also submitted my 485 without the employer's letter. She maintained that since I currently work for the petitioning employer, it is not required. She only submitted my pay advice.

    Thanks much for your time! We already applied without it.
    Lets see... I don;t have much in my hands other than waiting....





    tattoo day of dead art women. day of dead art women. day of dead art women.
  • day of dead art women.



  • dealsnet
    08-22 09:58 AM
    We are not terrorist. Majority are from India, China etc. You are asking for help from terrorists !!!!!!!!!!! (according to you)
    We didn't blow up any buildings. We built buildings, civilized world, literature and technology.
    We have more than 5000 years of civilized history. That time your people and Europeans are nomads and barbarians. We have great universities and Cities during ancient times.

    You are totally ignorant about the world you live. Leave about immigration. You are day dreaming. You thought just file I-485 will give you GC, you need to file I-130 or I-140 before that.

    The majority of you people are cruel and harsh individuals, how dare you insult a man that is sick just because of his weight. The majority of you are also from middle eastern countries - not exactly buddies with the USA. Canadians didn't come here to blow up buildings, people from your part of the world did. Canadians were here to help, and were one of the first countries on the scene.
    Canadians are allies, not enemies. You folks need to be the ones to go back where you came from!



    more...


    pictures day of dead art women. day of dead art women. day of dead art women
  • day of dead art women



  • ItIsNotFunny
    10-15 02:28 PM
    I have a doubt about what can be accomplished by the flower campaign. I am totally for it if it would help but just think - it is not in USCIS hands to assign more visas to EB3 or EB2. The number of visas is limited and the number of people waiting for the visas is huge. That is the whole cause of retrogression . If there were as many visas as the people everything would be current.

    This is a simple matter of demand and supply . The thing that can help is visa recapture but that again USCIS can't do and only the Congress . What we need to do is point our efforts in the right direction .

    Think how the supply is controlled?

    Just as a hypothetical example, if USCIS makes a spill over policy that ROW can not lead any other country by more than 3 years.

    If we try we can achieve something, atleast we can see some avenues. If we sit silent - Nope, then we are loosers not fighters.





    dresses This reminds me of an art show day of dead art women. day of dead art women.
  • day of dead art women.



  • amsgc
    02-04 02:12 AM
    See response below.

    Folks,

    I am not a naysayer, I think the IV core team has done a great job of giving a voice to us.

    But, there are a few questions that I am not convinced myself:

    1. why remove per country quota just for EB, why not family based immigration as well?

    => Unlike family based immigration, Employment based immigration is based on the expressed need of US businesses for skilled labor. The position filled by EB based immigrants are first advertised in the local market, and if a US Citizen or LPR is not found with the requisite skills, only then is that job offered to a foreigner with the requisite skills. This means that the foreigner is needed by the US business to perform services on a permanent basis. In essence, the US gets a well trained and experienced foreign worker who is able to contribute to the economy on the day he gets his Green Card. It is very important to note that this job offer is made solely on the skills, education and experience of the foreigner, and the need expressed by a business. Also note that these individuals constitute only 14% of total immigration.

    On the other hand, there is absolutely no information on how an individual who comes in through family based immigration will be able to find a job, and start contributing to the economy. I am not saying that these individuals are incompetent, only that there is no data on how they will fit in. If you look around you, you will find that most people who enter the US through family based immigration lack language skills, are much older, and find it difficult to start over and assimilate in a new country. Many end up doing odd jobs which can be really frustrating for them. Since there is really no business need for these individuals in this country, and because they are whopping 86% of all immigration, a cap on family based immigration does make sense.

    You also need to understand the other important difference – most EB folks have already assimilated into this culture – they have been here for several years, worked a couple of jobs and in many cases attended US graduate schools.



    2. what will happen after removing per country limits, what kind of numbers are we looking at? how many new PRs? What is the impact on the country,economic, social, cultural, I do care about the USA.

    => The result of removing per country limits will be that every individual will be given an equal opportunity to immigrate to the US based on their skills, education, and the specific need expressed by a US business. It will be a system where everybody gets in one line - first in, first out. Some will say that the current system is fair because every "country" gets a fair chance. But that is just and attempt to mislead. The "country" does not file a petition to immigrate; it is a skilled individual who files a petition to immigrate based on his skills, education and his requirement in the US.

    Regarding numbers - I will give you a simple example. My GC process was started 3 years ago. My co-worker, who is from a non-retrogressed country, started his application last year. We both applied in the same category, and work in similar positions. We also have similar skills - US MS in CS. Because of the country caps, my application is still pending, whereas he already got his GC. If the country caps were removed, my wait time would have reduced by a year, his wait time would have increased by a year - we both would get the GC after waiting approximately the same amount of time. It would have been a first in, first out system. But it is not so, and it needs to be fixed.

    Like you, we all care about the USA. I assure you that it will have only a positive social and cultural impact on the US. Why? Because removal of country caps would lead to a system that is based solely on merit and hard work. Isn't that what this country is about?

    Regarding diversity – the individuals from retrogressed countries are already here, assimilating into the American fabric. Whether you give them the GC now or ten years from now, they will still be here - it will not change the ethnic character of this country.

    3. By asking legislators to remove these per country quota limits, isn't this a paradigm shift in thinking?

    => This is not a paradigm shift. If you open your eyes and ears you will find hundreds of organizations set up across the US to educate and influence lawmakers about policies that should be put in place to better serve this country.

    When I, a guy impacted by this EB backlog am not convinced, how the heck are we going to make a case to some congressman/woman?

    => Once you begin to feel the pain, you will understand. Perhaps you are new to the system, and are hoping that it will get better. It will not be long before you will suddenly find that a good number of years have gone by just waiting.

    We should definitely move away from this snobbish view that EB folks are better than others, or that the USA needs the EB folks more than EB folks need the USA.

    => I am not sure where you get that EB folks are snobbish. It is not our issue - so whatever FB folks decide, it is up to them. Also, nobody said USA needs more EB folks, US businesses need the EB folks for whom a petition to immigrate has been filed and approved. Get the difference?


    That said, I do believe that we have a humanitarian case for folks like us who are already in the queue. Educating congress about the path taken by the average EB immigrant would help.
    => You just contradicted yourself. A few sentences ago you seemed to imply that you really did not understand what could be gained by removing the country caps.


    At the end of the day human life is human life even it is it Indian.
    => Really don't know what you are trying to say here. Anyway, if you feel the need to respond to this message, please do so after updating your profile.



    more...


    makeup Josephine March, Little Women. day of dead art women. girlfriend day of dead art
  • girlfriend day of dead art



  • harish
    05-29 10:05 PM
    Here is a cross-reference to my other post with the case updates...http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showpost.php?p=249686&postcount=85.

    Received our cards today!

    Good luck to the rest of you waiting on your approvals!





    girlfriend day of dead art women. day of dead art women. Day Of The Dead Art - El Dia
  • Day Of The Dead Art - El Dia



  • RNGC
    02-19 01:42 PM
    Read this carefully before you comment here:
    "fingerprints for information relating to criminal, national security, or other law enforcement actions that would render the alien ineligible for adjustment of status under this section".

    This is just to verify if the guys is in database for any criminal activity. ofcourse they will not give an illegal guy a GC if they have his record in database for criminal activity in US. This is just a formal requirement to keep illegal law brokers out because there are thousands illegals who came here from southern border and have committed crimes. There are some even in the America's Top 10 Wanted list. My uncles(came illegally here) went through all criminal checks by FBI for breaking any law,when Reagan gave amnesty for >5 years. Same criminal checks were done on illegals when Clinton helped legalalization of illegals. Fingerprints, etc are just for other criminal history check not to check if the person crossed the border illegally, ofcouse he did and broke the law: that's the whole point for him being illegal.

    In fact >5year rule has been a standard to give immigration to illegals as is clear by Reagan amnesty. If 5 year rule is not for illegals, then what do you think is there in this bill for 11 million illegals. Itn't that logical. Infact main purpose of this bill is to fix illegal immigrants not legals. If you think >5 years rule is just for legals, you need to read history books, read text carefully and be more logical: not blinded by desire to get your own GC if you are here >5years.

    Either way: I never said we should oppose the 5 year requirement. I just said that rules for "Legal <5 years" should be easier than rules for "illegal>5" years and please don't propagate false rumors here that this bill is just for legals in a blind desire for your own GC.


    So what if illegals are also covered in this! Illegals are kind of people suffering from their employers because they don't have any paperwork! We, are slightly better, we have paper work and still suffer at the hands of our employers, so we know their plight...So, I would say illegals also have to be considered. I DO NOT SUPPORT ILLEGALS. But they are human beings too and are living in the dark.....

    My take on ilegals is:
    1. Build a huge prison and put all of them in there and feed them rest of their life.
    OR
    2. Arrest all of them and deport them their home country
    IF 1 or 2 is not possible, better give them green card as long as they have not committed any crime and legalize them so no one takes advantage of them...we have had one round of slavery in this country and its consequence is still felt, lets not have another round of slavery with illegals.





    hairstyles day of dead art women. quot day of dead art women. day of dead art women. art
  • day of dead art women. art



  • desi3933
    03-11 11:12 AM
    See here this guy is also saying the same thing what my lawyer has predicted.
    http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?p=28881#post28881

    This is what Ron has said (link provided by you)
    --------
    I am just speculating, but it appears that the CIS has decided to concentrate on EB3 AOS cases and is trying to use up as much of the quota as possible there. At the same time, the State Department is slowly advancing the China/India EB2 cutoff dates to try to use up numbers there.
    -------------

    Two things -
    2. EB3 are being approved so use to use all available quota for EB3
    2. How slowly advancing for eb2 means current to you?





    msyedy
    06-12 09:04 AM
    our chances of getting some relief are better if infact CIR dies. if cir dies there might be a chance for SKIL bill.Even if SKIL is not taken up no bill is better than this CIR authored by ron hira aka kennedy, durbin and kyl.

    Pitha (Shree)
    I see what you are thinking, but EB3india is correct. In CIR or never.
    I agree with him that we need to get a new stratergy to handle this.

    I do not know why IV core has not spoken after this bill died. When CIR came to the Senate floor with all these restrictions, Logiclife mentioned something
    like we should become illegals.

    He must have been kidding but one could see the fact that the illegals were the ones who were getting the benefits.

    I want to hear a similar statement from them, let us see........





    rimzhim
    01-28 09:45 AM
    The original intent of country caps was to prevent one single country from monopolizing the immigration (but this was regular unskilled immigration like family based immigration etc). But when it comes to skill based immigration it is ridiculous to maintain country caps. Everybody including the US government, USCIS and industry know that country caps in skilled category are ridiculous. That is why in H1B they don’t enforce the country caps. Because if they enforce the country caps in H1b the whole H1 program will collapse. I know the difference between h1 and green cards but when you bring people into US on H1 without country caps they should not enforce country caps on H1 to green cards skilled category. The people who are oppose immigration are using this(the country cap or rather quota) as an excuse to make things worse for immigrantion.
    getting rid of country caps will hurt ppl from ROW. we need to be united, what do u say? H1B and EB visas are not related and should not be confused as related items. There are exemptions on H1b but none on EB.

    The country caps ensure equal distribution of immigrants from all parts of the world and not only the countries which have poured in immigrants in the last few decades.
    totally agree with this.

    Have full faith in IV and I am sure they will try to keep the interests of all in mind, not just of those from one country that will benefit from ending country-caps.



    0 comments:

    Post a Comment

    Blog Directory autos cars My Ping in TotalPing.com
    Web Directory